The Final Days of Sinn Féin
In every movement that lives long enough to taste the air of power, there comes a time when it must look itself in the mirror—and not all who gaze back will like what they see.
Sinn Féin—Irish by name, “Ourselves Alone”—was once the whisper of chivalry on the lips of poets and rebels. It was the ghost of Pearse at the GPO, the footstep of Mac Diarmada across the yard of Kilmainham, the courage of a father in Long Kesh who wrote to his child about freedom in a tongue forbidden in schools. It was not a party. It was a cause—noble, honourable, and led by the finest of patriots ever to grace Ireland.
That cause bore the weight of centuries. It was cradled by those whose grandfathers died during An Gorta Mór, whose fathers were hunted through hills and bog for daring to say Ireland was sovereign. It found shape in the Irish language, in the beauty of sean-nós, in the flags carried at commemorative events, in the mass-goers, in the men and women of conviction who believed in natural law, the soil of the land, and the God who made both.
This was one face of Sinn Féin: steadfast, patriotic, loyal to the Irish Republic, tempered by suffering, and burned into the soul by sacrifice. These are the people who still weep quietly at gravesides in Bodenstown, and Glasnevin, and who still sing Óró, Sé do Bheatha ‘Bhaile with sincerity, not irony.
But from within, something else has slowly come into being. A second face—strange, cold, and more global than Gaelic. It speaks not of the Irish nation but of the “island,” not of tradition but of transition. This side of Sinn Féin see the harp as outdated, the tricolour as inconvenient, and the anthem as embarrassing. They are multiculturalists, not Irish. They do not whisper the Rosary or carry The Soldiers’ Song in their pocket. They do not look to Pearse and Clarke as comrades but as curiosities—too Catholic, too conservative, too...
Irish.
This face has wrapped itself in modern slogans: radical open borders, gender fluidity, transgenderism, climate change as dogma, abortion not as tragedy but triumph. It is more comfortable in Brussels than Ballymurphy, and seeks to transform, not preserve. To reinvent, not remember.
It is a face that claims to speak for progress while silencing tradition. It tolerates no dissent, even within its own ranks. It has turned on those who built the movement—those who carried the coffins, did the time, bore the stigma, and walked with ghosts of those who gave everything for Ireland.
The very people who fought to keep Irish alive are now being told Irish is oppressive if it assumes gender. Those who believed Ireland should be a refuge for its people now watch their history labelled as hateful—'the Irish weren’t slaves,’ Connolly got that wrong. The new face is horrified that Ireland could be for the Irish, or that a man is not a woman.
There is a dissent among many in the old guard—some of whom are still young. They do not speak because unity is their prayer, and they still believe that Sinn Féin may yet deliver a United Ireland. They stay silent, even as their vision is gutted and replaced by ideology foreign to Ireland’s historic soul. They hope—perhaps—that the tricolour still flies for them, after all, if Ireland is free the old traditions could be restored.
But there is a question, is the division about to break?
The vast majority of the grassroots of Sinn Féin still hold the fire of old Ireland—whether they know it or not. They believe in sovereignty, in culture, in Gaelic identity, in justice for the poor, in dignity for the unborn. They are the descendants of 1916, not Davos.
And In the same way 88% of Sinn Féin voters voted to keep the term “woman” in the Constitution, they are now questioning why the leadership is so obsessed with trying to argue men are women. What happened women’s rights? What happened to sensible immigration? What happened to being opposed to the EU? What happened to opposing English monarchy?
This is where Sinn Féin is today—two distinct parties in one party—one side incapable of telling the difference between a man and a woman. The other that is exclusively focused on a United Ireland. It is inevitable that another split is emerging within Sinn Féin.
-Tomás MacCormaic
This article was originally published by An Claíomh Solais on May 21, 2025.Author: Tomás MacCormaic. Republished here with permission.
X: @AnClaiomhSolais
https://anclaiomhsolais.com/
Article published on: Wednesday 21st May 2025
If you’d like to have work published to our webpage, please get in contact with us here
